Skip to content
The Truth About Water Footprints and Pastured Beef

The Truth About Water Footprints and Pastured Beef

You may have heard the saying that reducing your red meat consumption can significantly lower your water footprint. It’s a claim often repeated in discussions about sustainability, but let me tell you why this statement can be misleading, especially when it comes to pastured operations like ours.

On our farm, our cattle's primary water source comes from streams fed by natural springs located on our property. These springs have a consistent flow rate, independent of whether or not our cattle are drinking from them. This means that the notion of our livestock depleting freshwater supplies is a misconception. The water isn’t being extracted from the springs any faster just because our cattle are drinking it.

In fact, once our cattle consume this water, it doesn't just disappear. Through natural processes like urination, perspiration, respiration, and manure, our cattle essentially recycle the water back into the environment. These processes contribute to replenishing the local ecosystem, promoting a natural and sustainable water cycle. Over time, these natural cycles help slowly recharge aquifers, ensuring that water is not lost but rather returned to the system. If our cattle weren’t drinking from these springs, the water would simply flow downstream into creeks, make its way to the Chattahoochee River, and eventually reach the ocean, where it would be converted into saltwater anyway.

In contrast, consider the water footprint of some monocultural crops that rely heavily on irrigation. These crops often require water to be pumped from underground aquifers at rates much higher than they would naturally replenish. This practice can lead to depletion of local water resources, often leaving aquifers drained and the local ecosystem stressed. When you compare this to the water usage of pastured beef, which relies on natural water sources without the need for excessive irrigation, it becomes clear that our beef actually has a smaller water footprint.

What many people don’t realize is that water used in natural systems, like the springs on our farm, is part of a regenerative cycle. It's used, filtered, and returned in a sustainable manner. On the other hand, water extracted for irrigation purposes in large-scale crop production can lead to depletion, especially when it's not part of a regenerative cycle.

So next time you hear that reducing red meat consumption is the best way to lower your water footprint, remember that not all beef production is created equal. Beef from pastured operations like ours, which utilize natural water sources and contribute positively to the local ecosystem, can have a much smaller water footprint than irrigated crops.

Understanding the nuances of water usage and sustainability is key to making informed choices that truly benefit the environment.

Previous article The Role of Dung Beetles in Our Farm’s Ecosystem

Comments

Rust - October 18, 2025

I learned an absolutely shocking reality about the claims of water use per lbs of beef. We’ve all heard the statistic that it takes 1800 gallons of water to produce a lbs of beef. It never made any sense to me. Of course they are including estimates of water to wash trucks and tractors used in farming. Even then, it seemed ridiculous. Then someone explained it. The water use calculation includes the rain that falls on the land used to both grow the feed and the pasture upon which the cattle live. They call this “green water”. If rain falls on the pasture, even when cattle are not on it, that’s counted. If rain falls on a tree inside the pasture fence. Counted. If the cows have all been sent to market and it snows all winter. Counted. Do they count the same for plant agriculture? Apparently not. There is a formula for how much water evaporates from leaves so they just use that, apparently. Even if they did, however, the acreage considered used for crops is just where crops are actively growing. For livestock they couldn’t the entire land mass of the farm and all pasture land, regardless of what is on it.

Eating organic plants and favoring sustainably, humanly produced meat is one of the most ethically and environmentally sound, healthy choices a person can make. We don’t need the lies and manipulation to distort the narrative.

Look it up. It is a shocking revelation of false information that became the chant of a movement whose goal was to deceive and mislead to further an unrelated agenda. Now that it’s out in the light, make your own choice and, do so with facts.

Leave a comment

Comments must be approved before appearing

* Required fields

Shop Our Beef

View All